Skip to content

News · Foreign policy · Pennsylvania

Haywood plans Pennsylvania AI safety legislation

The state senator is developing proposals for AI risk disclosures, transparency reports and reports of serious incidents.

Haywood plans Pennsylvania AI safety legislation

Key takeaways

  • Haywood is developing state AI safety legislation.
  • Possible rules include risk and governance disclosures.
  • Companies could face transparency and incident-reporting requirements.
  • No bill or introduction timeline has been announced.
  • Haywood is requesting public and expert input.

What Haywood is proposing

State Sen. Art Haywood, who represents parts of Philadelphia and Montgomery counties, announced plans on Sept. 15, 2026, to develop Pennsylvania legislation addressing safety and transparency at artificial intelligence companies operating in the state.

The possible requirements would make companies explain how they identify, oversee and reduce substantial risks connected to their AI systems. Other provisions could require regular public reports about safety practices and significant incidents, along with reports when an AI system causes serious harm or presents a major risk to the public.

Haywood said he is reviewing AI regulations used internationally and working with experts across Pennsylvania. His stated goals include corporate accountability, public transparency and critical-incident reporting.

Where the proposal stands

Haywood has not introduced legislative language or announced when he plans to do so. He is inviting Pennsylvania residents, technology experts, researchers, advocates and policymakers to contact his office with ideas while the proposal is being developed.

The announcement followed public warnings from artificial intelligence industry figures. Researchers at Anthropic have warned that advanced AI could pose an existential threat to humanity, while Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has called for slowing development so safety measures can catch up. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and other technology leaders have also raised concerns about the pace of development.

Any proposal would need to be formally introduced before lawmakers could consider its specific requirements. Its scope, enforcement system and definitions of substantial risk, serious harm and critical incidents have not yet been set out in bill text.

What to watch

  • When legislative text is introduced
  • How the proposal defines serious harm and substantial risk
  • Which companies and AI systems would be covered
  • How reporting requirements would be enforced

Was this useful?

Related stories