
News · CO
Denver Post opposes proposed DPS property tax increase
Economy and jobsThe newspaper’s editorial board opposes the DPS proposal, though its headline does not explain the fiscal or policy reasons.
News · Economy and jobs · Colorado
The November measure would lower rates on initial income, add higher rates above and reserve new revenue for public services.

Key takeaways
Colorado voters will decide Nov. 3 whether to replace the state’s 4.4% flat income tax with six marginal rates under Amendment 87. A marginal system applies each rate only to income within that bracket, not to a filer’s entire income.
The first of taxable income would be taxed at 3.7%. Income from to would face a 4.2% rate, and income from to would remain at 4.4%.
Higher rates would begin above. Income from to would be taxed at 7.4%, income from to at 7.9%, and income above at 8.4%.
Joint filers would use the same brackets but have larger standard deductions than single filers. Businesses would pay the graduated rates on their profits.
The change would raise overall state tax collections while reducing bills by hundreds of dollars for most residents. The highest-earning 0.01% of Coloradans could owe nearly twice as much in state income tax.
Revenue generated by the amendment would be kept separate and could be spent only on K-12 education, health care, early-childhood care and early education. It would have to supplement, rather than replace, existing legislative spending in those areas.
The added revenue would not count toward the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights revenue limit. It therefore would not be refunded or reduce refunds caused by other collections above that limit.
Supporters describe the measure as a fairer tax structure that would fund public services. Opponents call it a tax increase exceeding billion and warn of economic effects. The Cato Institute has argued that flat taxes are associated with higher individual incomes and economic growth.
What to watch
Was this useful?

News · CO
The newspaper’s editorial board opposes the DPS proposal, though its headline does not explain the fiscal or policy reasons.

News · CA
The California review will consider stronger AI safety rules, including mechanisms that could halt an AI system’s operation.

News · CA
The executive order calls for a way to stop AI models from operating, making shutdown capability a focus of California policy.

News · KS
Senators in both parties now view Kansas, Nebraska and New Hampshire as part of an expanded fight for Senate control.