Skip to content

News · Elections and voting · Montana

Judge blocks AI ad law against Montana PAC

The order stops Montana officials from applying the state’s AI campaign-ad restrictions to Dan Bartel and the Accountability in State Government PAC.

The Ballot Montana DeskSeptember 21, 2026
Judge blocks AI ad law against Montana PAC

Key takeaways

  • The order protects Bartel and ASG PAC from enforcement of the AI ad restrictions.
  • Watters found a credible enforcement threat raising free-speech concerns.
  • Montana’s law restricts certain deepfake campaign ads close to voting.
  • A disclosure can allow AI-altered campaign communications under the law.

What the judge ordered

A federal judge has barred Montana’s commissioner of political practices and attorney general from enforcing the state’s AI campaign-ad restrictions against former Republican legislator Dan Bartel and the Accountability in State Government PAC. U.S. District Judge Susan Watters issued the order after finding that the plaintiffs faced a credible threat of enforcement that raised First Amendment concerns.

Watters pointed to private complaints, a warning letter from Political Practices Commissioner Chris Gallus and the state’s failure to rule out enforcement. The order applies to Bartel and ASG PAC and allows them to proceed with planned general-election advertising.

ASG PAC indicated it would begin running ads against Democratic legislator Mary Ann Dunwell. A court filing includes an unreleased mailer depicting Dunwell as a country-western pickpocket taking a wallet from a cowboy.

How the law works

Montana law bars a person from paying for or sponsoring a campaign ad when the person knows or should know it uses a deepfake image or recording of a candidate or political party within 60 days before voting begins. The communication is allowed if it carries a clear disclosure that AI significantly altered the content and that it falsely appears authentic or truthful.

The dispute followed AI-generated primary-election mailers aimed at Republican candidates, including Jennifer Carlson of Manhattan. Carlson filed a complaint with the commissioner. Gallus testified in court that those mailers were satire and therefore exempt from the law, but Watters found the earlier enforcement steps still created a credible concern.

Bartel and ASG PAC argued that their ads were not deepfakes and that the required label burdened protected speech. Their attorney, Matt Monforton, described the case as a First Amendment challenge. Montana Free Press reported the ruling and details from the court file.

What to watch

  • Any further court proceedings on the First Amendment challenge.
  • Whether state officials appeal or seek changes to the order.
  • Whether ASG PAC runs its planned general-election advertising.
  • How Montana officials apply the order to Bartel and ASG PAC.

Was this useful?

Related stories