Skip to content

News · Elections and voting · Kansas

Kansas voters to weigh constitutional voting-rights wording

A proposed amendment would let Kansas voters decide whether to change state constitutional wording concerning voting rights.

Kansas voters to weigh constitutional voting-rights wording

Key takeaways

  • Kansas voters will decide the constitutional question.
  • The amendment concerns wording about voting rights.
  • Rep. Pat Proctor proposed the amendment.
  • Proctor is a Leavenworth Republican.
  • Proctor chairs the House Elections Committee.

A constitutional wording question

Kansas voters will decide whether to change wording in the Kansas Constitution concerning voting rights. The proposal is a constitutional amendment, and its subject is elections and voting. It is not tied directly to a candidate race or to the selection of an officeholder.

The voter decision centers on whether the constitution’s voting-rights language should be changed. That makes the wording itself the focus of the measure. The question before voters is about constitutional text, rather than a policy position attributed to a candidate in a campaign. No candidates are linked to the proposal.

Proctor proposed the amendment

State Rep. Pat Proctor proposed the amendment. Proctor is a Republican from Leavenworth and chairs the Kansas House Elections Committee. The proposal comes from a sitting legislator who leads the House committee focused on elections, but the voter decision is about the amendment rather than Proctor’s elected office.

The measure’s stated scope is a change in wording regarding voting rights. The decision requires voters to compare the constitution’s current wording with the amendment’s proposed wording. The ballot question will ask Kansas voters to decide whether that revision belongs in the state constitution.

What the decision covers

The amendment concerns constitutional language about voting rights in Kansas. It does not directly decide who holds public office, and no candidate policy stance is part of the question. Voters’ task is to evaluate the proposed constitutional wording on its own terms.

What to watch

  • The amendment’s proposed constitutional wording
  • The current language the amendment would change
  • The ballot language presented to Kansas voters

Was this useful?

Related stories