Skip to content

News · Immigration · California

Los Angeles limits immigration agents’ use of city property

A new ordinance adds Mayor Karen Bass’ municipal-property restrictions for immigration agents to the Los Angeles city code.

Los Angeles limits immigration agents’ use of city property

Key takeaways

  • The ordinance restricts immigration agents’ use of Los Angeles municipal property.
  • The policy began with Mayor Karen Bass’ Executive Directive 17 in February.
  • The new ordinance places the policy into city code.
  • Several cities have imposed similar municipal-property restrictions.

What changed

Los Angeles has enacted a new ordinance restricting immigration agents’ use of municipal property. The measure places into city code a policy Mayor Karen Bass first established through Executive Directive 17 in February. Bass issued the executive directive before the ordinance moved the same municipal-property approach into the city’s laws.

Bass said the February directive was intended to combat what she characterized as federal overreach by President Donald Trump’s administration. The ordinance makes that response part of city code rather than leaving the policy only in the earlier mayoral directive. Both actions address the same stated issue: federal immigration agents’ use of property belonging to the city.

What the restriction addresses

The city action is limited in subject to immigration agents and municipal property. Its focus is agents’ use of city property, and the ordinance gives Los Angeles a codified rule on that specific interaction. The February directive marks the start of the city’s policy sequence, while the ordinance is the step that puts the policy in code.

The change in form is central to the development. The policy began as an executive directive from the mayor and is now also written into the Los Angeles city code through the ordinance.

Broader city context

Los Angeles is one of several cities that have restricted immigration agents’ use of municipal property. Those local actions share a common subject: federal immigration agents’ use of property belonging to city governments. In Los Angeles, the defining change is the policy’s placement in city code after Bass’ February directive.

What to watch

  • How Los Angeles implements the ordinance
  • Whether the city issues guidance for municipal properties
  • Whether other cities put similar policies into local code

Was this useful?

Related stories