
News · CO
Colorado Supreme Court rejects Amendment 87 challenge
Elections and votingThe court rejected a lawsuit that sought to stop Amendment 87, leaving the measure unblocked by that legal action.
News · Elections and voting · Missouri
The justices are again considering Missouri’s congressional boundaries after an appeals court ordered the state to use a Trump-backed map.

Key takeaways
Missouri’s congressional map dispute is before the U.S. Supreme Court for a third time after a federal appeals court ordered the state to use district boundaries backed by President Donald Trump.
The appeals court’s order concerns which congressional map Missouri must use. The Supreme Court is again being asked to act in the dispute while the lower court’s direction to the state stands at the center of the case.
The renewed filing does not involve a candidate contest directly. It concerns the boundaries Missouri uses to organize its congressional districts and conduct voting within them.
The timing puts the court fight alongside the voting process. Absentee ballots are already going out while the legal dispute over the congressional boundaries remains active.
That means election administration and court proceedings are moving on overlapping schedules. The federal appeals court has directed Missouri to use the Trump-backed boundaries, while the dispute’s return to the Supreme Court creates another point at which the governing court order could be reviewed.
The next step depends on how the Supreme Court responds to the matter now before it. Its action will determine whether the appeals court’s order remains controlling or whether the legal posture changes as absentee voting continues.
Until the justices act, the federal appeals court’s instruction is the key ruling directing the state’s use of congressional boundaries. The case’s third appearance before the Supreme Court keeps the map question active after ballots have begun going out.
What to watch
Was this useful?

News · CO
The court rejected a lawsuit that sought to stop Amendment 87, leaving the measure unblocked by that legal action.

News · CO
The court rejected an anonymously funded lawsuit seeking to cancel the Amendment 87 vote shortly before Election Day.

News · CO
The court rejected a challenge seeking to invalidate the voter signatures that qualified Amendment 87 for the ballot.

News · UT
The federal agencies want a court to stop Utah from applying state gambling enforcement to prediction markets.