Skip to content

News · Health care · New Jersey

New Jersey’s Trump-Era Court Challenges Reach About 75

The cases cover immigration, federal funding, elections, health care, environmental rules, tariffs and infrastructure.

The Ballot New Jersey DeskSeptember 20, 2026
New Jersey’s Trump-Era Court Challenges Reach About 75

Key takeaways

  • New Jersey has filed or joined roughly 75 challenges since 2025.
  • About 45 to 46 began under Murphy and Platkin.
  • About 29 followed under Sherrill and Davenport.
  • The exact count depends on how related filings are counted.
  • Federal officials have filed lawsuits and appeals involving New Jersey.

State challenges span several policy areas

New Jersey has filed or joined about 75 court challenges against the Trump administration since President Donald Trump returned to the White House in 2025. The litigation concerns immigration, federal funding, elections, tariffs, health care, environmental regulations and major infrastructure projects.

Roughly 45 to 46 cases began under Gov. Phil Murphy and Attorney General Matt Platkin. About 29 more followed after Gov. Mikie Sherrill took office and Jennifer Davenport became attorney general.

The total is approximate because amended complaints and related actions may be counted differently. The transition between attorneys general also affects how some cases are assigned to each administration.

The challenges have addressed federal funding freezes, changes to federal programs, birthright citizenship, voting rules, health insurance, law-enforcement grants, driver information, student loans, family-planning money and immigration benefits.

Federal officials have also gone to court

The legal conflict runs in both directions. The Justice Department has sued New Jersey over state policies, while federal officials have pursued appeals in litigation involving the state.

In February, the department sued New Jersey and Sherrill over Executive Order 12. The order limits federal immigration officers’ access to certain nonpublic areas of state property and restricts the use of state facilities as staging areas for civil immigration enforcement.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi argued that New Jersey could not interfere with federal immigration operations. A judge dismissed the federal lawsuit on Sept. 4. Davenport said the ruling confirmed that the state may control access to its nonpublic property.

What to watch

  • New challenges or amended complaints added to the state’s count
  • Federal appeals in cases involving New Jersey
  • Court rulings on immigration, funding and regulatory disputes

Was this useful?

Related stories