
News · IN
Indiana attorney general’s office partners with ICE
ImmigrationThe state office announced cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, a government action not directly connected to an election.
News · Health care · Louisiana
Louisiana, Alabama and Arkansas say laws in New York, California and Massachusetts obstruct investigations into mailed abortion pills.

Key takeaways
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill joined Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall and Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin in suing New York, California and Massachusetts at the U.S. Supreme Court. The three Republican attorneys general argue that the states’ shield laws prevent cooperation with investigations of providers accused of sending abortion pills into states where abortion is banned.
The attorneys general also filed a separate lawsuit in Louisiana against more than 30 people and organizations. That case accuses the defendants of advertising, prescribing, dispensing or shipping abortion pills into Louisiana, Alabama and Arkansas.
Murrill described that activity as “drug dealing” and said Louisiana would continue enforcing its laws. The lawsuits target both the providers involved in the interstate distribution system and the state protections that limit assistance with outside investigations or prosecutions.
Louisiana has indicted New York physician Margaret Carpenter and California physician Remy Coeytaux over allegations that they prescribed abortion medication sent into Louisiana. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, both Democrats, rejected Louisiana’s requests to extradite the doctors.
The Supreme Court complaint points to Louisiana’s unsuccessful attempt to extradite Carpenter. New York later expanded its protections, including a provision allowing abortion-drug prescribers to leave their names off prescription labels. Newsom rejected the request involving Coeytaux in January, saying California would not assist another state in punishing doctors for abortion care that is legal in California.
The dispute follows the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and allowed elected officials to set abortion policy at the state level. The new cases place competing state policies before the courts: abortion restrictions in Louisiana, Alabama and Arkansas, and legal protections for providers operating from New York, California and Massachusetts.
What to watch
Was this useful?

News · IN
The state office announced cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, a government action not directly connected to an election.

News · IN
The Indiana attorney general has entered into an agreement with ICE, marking a new state-federal administrative action.

News · AL
Alabama’s attorney general has announced a settlement with TikTok valued in the millions of dollars.

News · NJ
The state action targets synthetic kratom and is not directly connected to a New Jersey election or candidate.