Skip to content

News · Elections and voting · Wisconsin

Crowley proposes prediction market ban for elected officials

Crowley’s Wisconsin proposal would prohibit elected officials from participating in prediction markets.

Crowley proposes prediction market ban for elected officials

Key takeaways

  • Crowley proposed a prediction market ban for elected officials.
  • The proposal is not connected to a candidate race or election.
  • The final language would determine which officials and activities are covered.
  • The proposal must complete the applicable legal process to take effect.

Proposed restriction

Crowley has proposed a Wisconsin ban preventing elected officials from participating in prediction markets. The policy is aimed at people who hold elected public office, rather than candidates in a particular campaign. It is not directly linked to a race or election, and no candidate is attached to the proposal.

The proposal starts a policy process; it does not by itself impose a prohibition. For a binding restriction, the measure would have to complete whatever legal steps apply to the form Crowley chooses. Its practical effect will depend on the final language and how the restriction is implemented.

Questions that shape the ban

The proposal’s reach will turn on how “elected officials” and “prediction markets” are defined. The text will also need to identify what conduct is barred, including the transactions or activities covered by the restriction. Other central terms include which offices fall under the rule, when it takes effect, who administers it and what happens after a violation.

Those choices determine whether one statewide rule applies across elected offices or whether the restriction has narrower coverage. They also determine what officials must do to comply and how the public can understand the rule. The next steps to watch are the release or filing of formal language, consideration by the relevant government body and any decision that would put the restriction into effect.

What to watch

  • Release or filing of formal language
  • Definitions of covered officials and activities
  • Consideration by the relevant government body
  • Enforcement and effective-date provisions

Was this useful?

Related stories